We Are The Music Makers And We Are The Dreamers Of The Dreams
Saw "Charlie & The Chocolate Factory" last night. Here are my thoughts, beware of spoilers.
A bit of back story: Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory is, in my opinion, genius. I keep it in the category of most favorite non-drama film. I absolutely love every element about it and keep it in the "perfect" category: those films that you couldn't add anything to or subtract anything from.
I'll refer to the remake as "Charlie" and the original as "Willy".
"Charlie" was, what would seem to be the most ideal fit ever for Tim Burton. The over-the-top fantasy of the concept, the inherent darkness of the story, the mix of universal appeal and sly subversion. I found myself really liking the first act, then liking it less as it went on. Here's why. The opening and introduction of the nameless city where Charlie and his family live were fantastic. Charlie was perfectly cast, as were his parents and grandparents. Found it a little odd that he slept 12 inches from an open hole in the ceiling during a snowy winter, but maybe that was one of those "true to the book" elements that they are so happy about with this new version. Never read the book. The flashback sequences that give insight into Wonka were great. The introductions of all the golden ticket winners, I really liked as well. The production design was wonderful, everything I'd hoped for. Right up until Wonka opens his factory doors, I had the feeling that Burton had really done it, made a film that was truly worthy of being judged with the original, while adding a fresh take and added scope to the story. Well, that feeling gave way to a chilly uncomfortable feeling once Johnny Depp's Wonka took over.
Wonka in "Charlie" is a weird man-child, a victim of seclusion and arrested development. Makes sense why Depp is getting all the Michael Jackson comparisons. He giggles, snaps, is immature, easily provoked, and obviously doesn't like any of the children or their parents. I actually got a kick out of how devious and perverse he was. After a while, I really sensed some things were sadly lacking. It began with the chocolate room. If one scene came to mind when I first heard Tim Burton's name associated with the new movie, it was this scene. The fantastic, completely edible, man-made landscape within the factory walls that first creates the idea of Wonka's genius in "Willy". This was the first letdown. Nothing in the room seemed edible, let alone delicious. The grey of the factory walls were imposing, and it seemed Burton went right into showing the children and parents as monsters with red liquid smeared all over their faces instead of letting the first experience into the room be pleasant and wonderous. Augustus is sucked up the tube from the chocolate river, and the first of the completely wrong parent reactions began. The mother didn't seem to care, she was pretty damn cool and reserved to see her tubby little offspring turn into a giant intestinal blockage. It seemed the fate of the first child was inevitable, no surprise at all. Yeah, that was probably because I knew just what was going to happen, or because Burton never let the factory be a place of wonder for a second before he began picking off the brats one-by-one.
As they met their fates, the parents didn't seem to react, assist, or even bat an eye, and that bugged me. If the parents aren't fighting Wonka as their brats are being sucked up tubes, etc., then Wonka's creepy ambivalence doesn't have much impact. I never saw the direct connection of the parents' character defects and their children's' bad personalities, either.
Also didn't dig the chocolate factory being this super CG, infinite, completely impossible space. I prefer "Willy's" sense of the chocolate factory being somewhat plausible ...if improbable.
Wonka just got more and more two dimensional as the movie wore on. Hard to imagine him as a genius, or as a master puppeteer of this whole shebang, after a while he just seemed creepy. Just creepy. Wilder's Wonka was SO much better, facts are facts. He seemed wildly creative, demanding, single-minded in his vision, brilliant, cold, self-centered, but somehow also warm and compassionate.
So even with the last minute humanizing of Wonka in the new version, and the sudden growth of a heart in the story line, I left feeling that I had watched a good movie, but wasn't especially emotionally attached to it. Nice wrapping, but kind of an empty aftertaste.


Comments
Best review of this movie so far.
I absolutely love Johnny but at times I didn’t care for his acting. I think some of his parts were genius and were pulled off quite nicely and the others were to plastic.
I guess I just expected more
Posted by: wendybird | July 26, 2005 11:57 AM
Exactly! The biggest disapointment to me was the choclate room. I was SO looking forward to Burton's vision of it, and it was COMPLETELY lacking =( As far as Johnny Depp's Wonka, I just approached it as 2 completely different "Wonka's" I like that he didn't try to "re-do" Gene Wilder, because it couldn't be done, but yes creepy, and less of a teacher (of the morals of the story or whatever) and more of the one who actually learns in the end. But gotta love that little Charly!! Not upset that I went to see it (i hate going to the movies), but I still prefer the original, and it made me wanna watch the original even more!
Posted by: Abby | July 26, 2005 03:23 PM
hey Steve,
whoa... had to be careful - haven't seen the movie yet, so didn't want to read your post yet...
i just stopped by today to catch up a little, and to say "HELLO!" i see life's been eventful. hope you guys play soon - i need a fix! ;)
Posted by: SnoWhite | July 26, 2005 04:32 PM
Well that makes it two movies he's done that should never have been remade. Wilder was sheer fucking genius in that film.
Posted by: mike | July 27, 2005 09:43 AM
I thought it was decent and I enjoyed the Oompa Loompas and their songs much more in the new one. I also thought it unfortunate that there wasn't that same secne of wonderment that the children and parents go through, that they just jump right into stuffing their greedy faces, but also they didn't ever leave their characters which seemed fitting to me. So all in all I think that it was a good movie and much more interesting than a ton of the shit that Hollywood is turning out.
But what excited me most about the movie was the Corpse Bride preview. I love The Nightmare Before Christmas and I can't wait to see this.
Posted by: Aaron | July 27, 2005 09:12 PM
Still haven't found time in this crazy schedule to see the flick. Think I will this weekend. Sounds like a winner..
Posted by: Jonathan | July 28, 2005 05:45 PM
I need to read the book to see who stayed true to Dahl's version. My guess would be Tim Burton, since old Hollywood loves to change things around a lot to squeeze in a musical sequence, which worked for Willy Wonka. I really did not like the Oompa Loompas in this new version. They looked like "Joe Pesci, as "My Favorite Martian", in a cloning experiment gone wrong". It just did not work for me. I admit though, I saw it at the drive-in theatre (gotta support them to keep them running! They're cheap, and a great piece of Americana!), and well, I snoozed through a few minutes here and there. There was no lickable wall paper was there? No "Snozzberries"!!!!? Dahl and Burton seem like a match made in Heaven. I love his take on childrens books. His vision of "Where the wild things are" would be interesting!
Posted by: Joyce | August 27, 2005 08:54 AM